Drag the divider — reality on the left, the structural model on the right.
Structural analysis starts by simplifying reality — choosing supports, idealizing members, and making assumptions that turn a real building into a solvable model.
A structural model is a simplified representation of reality. Real columns aren't perfectly straight, real connections aren't perfectly pinned or fixed, and real loads aren't perfectly uniform. The model ignores these details on purpose — because including every real-world imperfection would make the problem unsolvable without adding meaningful accuracy. The art is knowing which simplifications are safe and which are dangerous.
A good assumption is conservative and captures the dominant behavior: modeling a flexible connection as a pin (safe — it overestimates midspan moment). A bad assumption ignores a real effect that matters: treating a tall, slender wall as a short, stocky wall (unsafe — ignores buckling). The test: if the real behavior is worse than what your model predicts, your assumption is unconservative. Always err on the side of predicting more demand, not less.